FirePro M4000 vs Radeon R7 A360
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro M4000 and Radeon R7 A360, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro M4000 stacks up against Radeon R7 A360, check out specs charts below.
Radeon R7 A360
FirePro M4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4000 | Radeon R7 A360 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R7 A360 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro M4000 and Radeon R7 A360 have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- FirePro M4000 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 A360 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and Radeon R7 A360 - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 A360 is 125 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 and Radeon R7 A360 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4000 is 4497 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A360.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1800% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A360 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 768p | 90−95 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 275% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A360 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Dota 2 is 165% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Fortnite is 204% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Minecraft is 79% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 362% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | − |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in World of Tanks is 128% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4000 | Radeon R7 A360 | |
| Architecture | GCN | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | Cape Verde GLM | Meso |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 July 2012 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 980 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 23.52 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 864.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 3.6 GB/s |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 57.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2 |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 79 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| Check Price |