FirePro M7740 vs Radeon R7 A360
When choosing between FirePro M7740 and Radeon R7 A360, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M7740 and Radeon R7 A360.
Radeon R7 A360
FirePro M7740 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M7740 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M7740 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M7740 | Radeon R7 A360 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro M7740 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 A360 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro M7740 and Radeon R7 A360 have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- FirePro M7740 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 A360 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M7740 is build with Terascale 1 architecture, and Radeon R7 A360 - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 A360 is 75 MHz higher, than FirePro M7740.
- FirePro M7740 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 A360 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M7740 is 997 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A360.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1600% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A360 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
high / 768p | 80−85 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 242% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A360 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Dota 2 is 141% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Fortnite is 181% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Grand Theft Auto V is 173% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Minecraft is 73% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 300% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
low / 768p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | − |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in World of Tanks is 128% more, than Radeon R7 A360. |
Full Specs
FirePro M7740 | Radeon R7 A360 | |
Architecture | Terascale 1 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | RV740 | Meso |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 4 August 2009 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 980 MHz | |
Transistor count | 826 million | 1,550 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 20.80 | 23.52 |
Floating-point performance | 832.0 gflops | 864.0 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 3.6 GB/s |
Memory bandwidth | 54.14 GB/s | 57.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2 |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |