GeForce 940MX vs Radeon R7 A360
In this comparison between GeForce 940MX and Radeon R7 A360 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 940MX will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 A360 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 A360
GeForce 940MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 940MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 940MX here:
Main Specs
GeForce 940MX | Radeon R7 A360 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 23 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce 940MX has 3 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 A360.
- GeForce 940MX is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 A360 - in Desktops.
- GeForce 940MX is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R7 A360 - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 940MX is 397 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A360.
- GeForce 940MX and Radeon R7 A360 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 940MX is 3997 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A360.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1600% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A360 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−33 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
high / 768p | 80−85 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 257% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A360 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Dota 2 is 148% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Fortnite is 181% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Grand Theft Auto V is 173% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Minecraft is 79% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 300% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
low / 768p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | − |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in World of Tanks is 128% more, than Radeon R7 A360. |
Full Specs
GeForce 940MX | Radeon R7 A360 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | N16S-GTR-B/S | Meso |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 10 March 2016 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 1122 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1242 MHz | 980 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,550 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 23.83 | 23.52 |
Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops | 864.0 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 3.6 GB/s |
Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB/s | 57.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2 |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 102 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
Check Price |