GRID K160Q vs Radeon R7 A360
In this comparison between GRID K160Q and Radeon R7 A360 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K160Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 A360 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K160Q
Radeon R7 A360
Main Specs
| GRID K160Q | Radeon R7 A360 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- GRID K160Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 A360 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GRID K160Q and Radeon R7 A360 have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 A360 - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 125 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A360.
- GRID K160Q and Radeon R7 A360 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K160Q is 1779 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A360.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 800% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K160Q and Radeon R7 A360 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 135% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GRID K160Q and Radeon R7 A360 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Dota 2 is 79% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Fortnite is 90% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 118% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 175% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in World of Tanks is 68% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K160Q | Radeon R7 A360 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | GK107 | Meso |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 980 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 23.52 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 864.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 3.6 GB/s |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | 57.6 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |