GRID K260Q vs Radeon R7 A360
When choosing between GRID K260Q and Radeon R7 A360, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K260Q and Radeon R7 A360.
GRID K260Q
Radeon R7 A360
Main Specs
| GRID K260Q | Radeon R7 A360 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- GRID K260Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 A360 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GRID K260Q has 1 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 A360.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 A360 - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of GRID K260Q is 20 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A360.
- GRID K260Q and Radeon R7 A360 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 4997 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A360.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3100% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A360 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 471% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A360 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 255% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 95−100 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 340% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | − |
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 357% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 49% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 612% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | − |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 192% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K260Q | Radeon R7 A360 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | GK104 | Meso |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 980 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 23.52 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 864.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 3.6 GB/s |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 57.6 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |