Iris Graphics 5100 vs Radeon R7 A360
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Iris Graphics 5100 and Radeon R7 A360. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Iris Graphics 5100 and Radeon R7 A360. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R7 A360
Iris Graphics 5100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 5100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 5100 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Graphics 5100 | Radeon R7 A360 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Iris Graphics 5100 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Radeon R7 A360 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 A360 - in Desktops.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Radeon R7 A360 - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 A360 is 525 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 A360 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1400% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A360 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 210% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A360 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Dota 2 is 124% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Fortnite is 159% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Minecraft is 64% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 300% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | − |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in World of Tanks is 100% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Graphics 5100 | Radeon R7 A360 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 7.5 Haswell | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | Haswell GT3 | Meso |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 5 June 2013 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 40 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,300 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 48.00 | 23.52 |
| Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3.6 GB/s | |
| Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.80 | 1.2 |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |