Iris Graphics 6100 vs Radeon R7 A360
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Graphics 6100 and Radeon R7 A360, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Graphics 6100 stacks up against Radeon R7 A360, check out specs charts below.
Radeon R7 A360
Iris Graphics 6100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 6100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 6100 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Graphics 6100 | Radeon R7 A360 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Iris Graphics 6100 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Radeon R7 A360 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 A360 - in Desktops.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Radeon R7 A360 - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 A360 is 425 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 6100.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 A360 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A360 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | − |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 171% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A360 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Dota 2 is 106% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Fortnite is 136% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | − |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 121% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Minecraft is 64% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | − |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in World of Tanks is 100% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Graphics 6100 | Radeon R7 A360 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 8 Broadwell | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | Broadwell GT3 | Meso |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 5 January 2015 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 48 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 52.80 | 23.52 |
| Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3.6 GB/s | |
| Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.80 | 1.2 |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |