Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon R7 A360
When comparing Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon R7 A360, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon R7 A360 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R7 A360
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon R7 A360 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Radeon R7 A360 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 A360 - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Radeon R7 A360 - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 A360 is 425 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 A360 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A360 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | − |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 171% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A360 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Dota 2 is 106% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Fortnite is 136% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | − |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 121% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Minecraft is 60% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | − |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
low / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in World of Tanks is 100% more, than Radeon R7 A360. |
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon R7 A360 | |
Architecture | Gen. 8 Broadwell | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Broadwell GT3e | Meso |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 2 June 2015 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 48 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | 980 MHz |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,550 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 40.80 | 23.52 |
Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops | 864.0 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 3.6 GB/s | |
Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 | 1.2 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Radeon R7 A360 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- Radeon R7 A360 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs GeForce 720A
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 6550A
- Radeon R7 A360 vs GeForce 720A
- Radeon R7 A360 vs Radeon HD 6550A