Quadro CX vs Radeon R7 A360
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro CX and Radeon R7 A360. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro CX and Radeon R7 A360. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro CX
Radeon R7 A360
Main Specs
Quadro CX | Radeon R7 A360 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
- Quadro CX is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 A360 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro CX has 1535 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 A360.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Quadro CX is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 A360 - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 A360 is 123 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
- Quadro CX is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 A360 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro CX is 1597 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A360.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1000% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro CX and Radeon R7 A360 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 167% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
Quadro CX and Radeon R7 A360 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Dota 2 is 106% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Fortnite is 113% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Minecraft is 35% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 7−8 | − |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in World of Tanks is 88% more, than Radeon R7 A360. |
Full Specs
Quadro CX | Radeon R7 A360 | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | GT200B | Meso |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 11 November 2008 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 602 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 980 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,550 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.53 | 23.52 |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 864.0 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 3.6 GB/s |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 57.6 GB/s |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2 |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
Similar compares
- Quadro CX vs GeForce GT 645M
- Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R7 A360 vs GeForce GT 645M
- Radeon R7 A360 vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Quadro CX vs GeForce 720A
- Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 6550A
- Radeon R7 A360 vs GeForce 720A
- Radeon R7 A360 vs Radeon HD 6550A