Quadro K2100M vs Radeon R7 A360
When choosing between Quadro K2100M and Radeon R7 A360, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro K2100M and Radeon R7 A360.
Radeon R7 A360
Quadro K2100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2100M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K2100M | Radeon R7 A360 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K2100M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R7 A360 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro K2100M has 1 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 A360.
- Quadro K2100M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 A360 - in Desktops.
- Quadro K2100M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 A360 - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 A360 is 58 MHz higher, than Quadro K2100M.
- Quadro K2100M and Radeon R7 A360 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K2100M is 2997 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A360.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1600% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A360 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 228% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A360 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Dota 2 is 131% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Fortnite is 159% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 173% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Minecraft is 69% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 300% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | − |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in World of Tanks is 120% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K2100M | Radeon R7 A360 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | GK106 | Meso |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 23 July 2013 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 576 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 667 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 980 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.02 | 23.52 |
| Floating-point performance | 768.4 gflops | 864.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz | 3.6 GB/s |
| Memory bandwidth | 48.0 GB/s | 57.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5 | 6.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 38 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |