Quadro M2000M vs Radeon R7 A360
In this comparison between Quadro M2000M and Radeon R7 A360 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro M2000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 A360 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 A360
Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro M2000M | Radeon R7 A360 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro M2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R7 A360 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro M2000M has 3 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 A360.
- Quadro M2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 A360 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M2000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R7 A360 - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 313 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A360.
- Quadro M2000M and Radeon R7 A360 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 4997 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A360.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | − |
4K / 2160p | 40−45 | − |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 514% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
Quadro M2000M and Radeon R7 A360 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Dota 2 is 279% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Fortnite is 422% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 95−100 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 410% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Minecraft is 49% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 737% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
low / 768p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in World of Tanks is 180% more, than Radeon R7 A360. |
Full Specs
Quadro M2000M | Radeon R7 A360 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | GM107 | Meso |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 1038 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1197 MHz | 980 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,550 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.92 | 23.52 |
Floating-point performance | 1,405 gflops | 864.0 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 3.6 GB/s |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 57.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 173 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |