Radeon 520 vs Radeon R7 A360
In this comparison between Radeon 520 and Radeon R7 A360 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon 520 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 A360 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 A360
Radeon 520 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon 520 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon 520 here:
Main Specs
Radeon 520 | Radeon R7 A360 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon 520 has 1 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 A360.
- Radeon 520 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 A360 - in Desktops.
- Radeon 520 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 A360 - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon 520 is 305 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A360.
- Radeon 520 and Radeon R7 A360 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon 520 is 2247 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A360.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Radeon 520 and Radeon R7 A360 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Radeon 520 and Radeon R7 A360 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
high / 768p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
Radeon 520 and Radeon R7 A360 have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
Radeon 520 and Radeon R7 A360 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Radeon 520 and Radeon R7 A360 have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Radeon 520 and Radeon R7 A360 have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
Radeon 520 and Radeon R7 A360 have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
Radeon 520 and Radeon R7 A360 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
low / 720p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon 520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 25% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
Radeon 520 and Radeon R7 A360 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
Radeon 520 | Radeon R7 A360 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Oland | Meso |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 21 March 2017 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 320 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 1030 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 980 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,550 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 20.60 | 23.52 |
Floating-point performance | 659.2 gflops | 864.0 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz | 3.6 GB/s |
Memory bandwidth | 16 GB/s | 57.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12.0 | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | + | 1.2 |
Check Price |