Radeon R7 A360 vs Tesla C2050
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Radeon R7 A360 and Tesla C2050, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Radeon R7 A360 stacks up against Tesla C2050, check out specs charts below.
Radeon R7 A360
Tesla C2050
Main Specs
| Radeon R7 A360 | Tesla C2050 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 238 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 3 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
- Radeon R7 A360 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2050 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 A360.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Radeon R7 A360 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 A360 is 151 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- Radeon R7 A360 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 2997 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A360.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 514% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| Radeon R7 A360 and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 279% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 422% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 410% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 49% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 737% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | − | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R7 A360 | Tesla C2050 | |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | Meso | GF100 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 5 May 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 980 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,550 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 23.52 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3.6 GB/s | 3000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |