Radeon R7 A360 vs Tesla C2075

Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Radeon R7 A360 and Tesla C2075. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Radeon R7 A360 and Tesla C2075. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.

Radeon R7 A360

Tesla C2075 Check Price

Main Specs

	Radeon R7 A360	Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)		247 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	6 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI
		Check Price

Radeon R7 A360 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2075 has 5 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 A360.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Radeon R7 A360 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of Radeon R7 A360 is 151 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Radeon R7 A360 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Tesla C2075 is 3129 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A360.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
low / 720p	1−2	35−40
medium / 1080p	0−1	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than Radeon R7 A360.
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	0−1	55−60
medium / 1080p	−	30−35
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon R7 A360.
low / 768p	60−65	210−220
medium / 768p	27−30	190−200
ultra / 1080p	7−8	100−110
QHD / 1440p	−	65−70
4K / 2160p	−	30−35
high / 768p	16−18	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 496% more, than Radeon R7 A360.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
Radeon R7 A360 and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	45−50	110−120
medium / 768p	10−11	100−110
ultra / 1080p	0−1	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 279% more, than Radeon R7 A360.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	−	21−24
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	14−16
low / 720p	21−24	110−120
medium / 1080p	0−1	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 422% more, than Radeon R7 A360.
high / 1080p	0−1	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−11
low / 720p	0−1	60−65
medium / 1080p	0−1	30−35
low / 768p	18−20	90−95
medium / 768p	−	80−85
high / 1080p	0−1	30−35
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 384% more, than Radeon R7 A360.
high / 1080p	−	10−12
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	0−1	30−35
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 768p	75−80	110−120
high / 1080p	27−30	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 49% more, than Radeon R7 A360.
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	8−9	60−65
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 675% more, than Radeon R7 A360.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	30−35
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
low / 768p	0−1	60−65
medium / 768p	−	35−40
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 768p	45−50	90−95
medium / 768p	14−16	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	35−40
high / 768p	12−14	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than Radeon R7 A360.

Full Specs

	Radeon R7 A360	Tesla C2075
Architecture	GCN 3.0	Fermi 2.0
Code name	Meso	GF110
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	5 May 2015	25 July 2011
Pipelines	384	448
Core clock speed	725 MHz	574 MHz
Boost Clock	980 MHz
Transistor count	1,550 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	23.52	32.14
Floating-point performance	864.0 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length		248 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	3.6 GB/s	3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth	57.6 GB/s	150.3 GB/s
DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.0	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.1
Vulkan	1.2	N/A
CUDA		2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		94 Mh/s
		Check Price

Radeon R7 A360 vs Tesla C2075

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares