Radeon R7 A360 vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Radeon R7 A360 and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Radeon R7 A360 and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R7 A360
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU here:
Main Specs
Radeon R7 A360 | UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Radeon R7 A360 is used in Desktops, and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU - in Laptops.
- Radeon R7 A360 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 A360 is 425 MHz higher, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU.
- Radeon R7 A360 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1600% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A360 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 242% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A360 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Dota 2 is 141% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Fortnite is 181% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Grand Theft Auto V is 173% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Minecraft is 79% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 300% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | − | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in World of Tanks is 128% more, than Radeon R7 A360. |
Full Specs
Radeon R7 A360 | UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU | |
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | Meso | Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 5 May 2015 | 28 May 2019 |
Pipelines | 384 | 32 |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 980 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,550 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 23.52 | |
Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 3.6 GB/s | |
Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 6.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | 1.2 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Radeon R7 A360 vs GeForce 720A
- Radeon R7 A360 vs Radeon HD 6550A
- UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU vs GeForce 720A
- UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU vs Radeon HD 6550A
- Radeon R7 A360 vs Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri
- Radeon R7 A360 vs Iris Plus Graphics 640
- UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU vs Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri
- UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU vs Iris Plus Graphics 640