FirePro S7150 vs Radeon R7 Carrizo
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro S7150 and Radeon R7 Carrizo. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro S7150 and Radeon R7 Carrizo. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro S7150
Radeon R7 Carrizo is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 Carrizo is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 Carrizo here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S7150 | Radeon R7 Carrizo | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 12-35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S7150 has 1150% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 Carrizo.
- FirePro S7150 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 Carrizo - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7150 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 Carrizo - with GCN 1.2/2.0.
- FirePro S7150 and Radeon R7 Carrizo are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 571% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Battlefield 5 is 655% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 192% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Dota 2 is 125% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Far Cry 5 is 816% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Fortnite is 383% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 536% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 336% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 740% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 14−16 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 10−12 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 711% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in World of Tanks is 76% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S7150 | Radeon R7 Carrizo | |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.2/2.0 |
| Code name | Tonga | Carrizo |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 February 2016 | 4 June 2015 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 920 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 800 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 2410 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 117.8 | |
| Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops | |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | DirectX 12 (FL 12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |