GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon R7 Carrizo
When comparing GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon R7 Carrizo, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon R7 Carrizo is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon R7 Carrizo is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 Carrizo is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 Carrizo here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon R7 Carrizo | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 12-35 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 1150% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 Carrizo.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 Carrizo - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R7 Carrizo - with GCN 1.2/2.0.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 Carrizo - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 114% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Battlefield 5 is 111% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon R7 Carrizo have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 51% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 Carrizo in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Dota 2 is 37% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Far Cry 5 is 150% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Fortnite is 54% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Grand Theft Auto V is 63% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 160% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 122% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in World of Tanks is 39% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon R7 Carrizo | |
Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.2/2.0 |
Code name | GF104 | Carrizo |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 15 November 2010 | 4 June 2015 |
Pipelines | 288 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 800 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 2410 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | |
Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12 (FL 12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.1 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Check Price |