Radeon R7 Carrizo vs Radeon R9 370
When comparing Radeon R7 Carrizo and Radeon R9 370, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon R7 Carrizo and Radeon R9 370 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R9 370
Radeon R7 Carrizo is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 Carrizo is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 Carrizo here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R7 Carrizo | Radeon R9 370 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12-35 Watt | 110 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R9 370 has 816% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 Carrizo.
- Radeon R7 Carrizo is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 370 - in Desktops.
- Radeon R7 Carrizo is build with GCN 1.2/2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 370 - with GCN 1.0.
- Radeon R7 Carrizo and Radeon R9 370 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 571% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Battlefield 5 is 655% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 192% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Dota 2 is 125% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Far Cry 5 is 816% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Fortnite is 383% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 536% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 336% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 740% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 14−16 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 10−12 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 711% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in World of Tanks is 76% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R7 Carrizo | Radeon R9 370 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.2/2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Carrizo | Trinidad |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 4 June 2015 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 1280 |
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 800 MHz | 975 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2410 Million | 2,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 78.00 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops | |
| Length | 221 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | DirectX 12 (FL 12_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 336 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |