Radeon R7 Carrizo vs Tesla T4
When comparing Radeon R7 Carrizo and Tesla T4, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon R7 Carrizo and Tesla T4 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla T4
Radeon R7 Carrizo is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 Carrizo is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 Carrizo here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R7 Carrizo | Tesla T4 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12-35 Watt | 70 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Tesla T4 has 483% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 Carrizo.
- Radeon R7 Carrizo is used in Laptops, and Tesla T4 - in Desktops.
- Radeon R7 Carrizo is build with GCN 1.2/2.0 architecture, and Tesla T4 - with Turing.
- Radeon R7 Carrizo is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla T4 - by 12 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 571% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Battlefield 5 is 655% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 192% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Dota 2 is 125% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Far Cry 5 is 816% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Fortnite is 383% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Forza Horizon 4 is 536% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Grand Theft Auto V is 336% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 740% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 14−16 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 10−12 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 711% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in World of Tanks is 76% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R7 Carrizo | Tesla T4 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.2/2.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Carrizo | TU104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 4 June 2015 | 13 September 2018 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 2560 |
| Core clock speed | 585 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 800 MHz | 1590 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2410 Million | 13,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 254.4 | |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 320.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | DirectX 12 (FL 12_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| CUDA | 7.5 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |