FirePro S7000 vs Radeon R7 M270
In this comparison between FirePro S7000 and Radeon R7 M270 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S7000 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M270 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro S7000
Radeon R7 M270 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M270 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M270 here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7000 | Radeon R7 M270 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | Not Listed |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M270 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M270 - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 M270 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 125 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M270.
- FirePro S7000 and Radeon R7 M270 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 4100% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S7000 and Radeon R7 M270 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | − |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | − |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 560% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
FirePro S7000 and Radeon R7 M270 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 313% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 468% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | − |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 452% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 62% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 800% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than Radeon R7 M270. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7000 | Radeon R7 M270 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN |
Code name | Pitcairn | Opal XT / Mars |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 27 August 2012 | 7 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 825 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 19.80 |
Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | 633.6 gflops |
Length | 292 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |