GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon R7 M270
When comparing GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon R7 M270, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon R7 M270 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 280
Radeon R7 M270 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M270 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M270 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | Radeon R7 M270 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | Not Listed |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M270 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce GTX 280 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M270 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 M270 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 471 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M270.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M270 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 189% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Dota 2 is 124% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Fortnite is 136% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Minecraft is 69% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | − |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in World of Tanks is 96% more, than Radeon R7 M270. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | Radeon R7 M270 | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN |
Code name | GT200 | Opal XT / Mars |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 7 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 240 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 825 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | 19.80 |
Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | 633.6 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
FreeSync | + | |
CUDA cores | 240 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |