GRID M6 8Q vs Radeon R7 M270
When choosing between GRID M6 8Q and Radeon R7 M270, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID M6 8Q and Radeon R7 M270.
GRID M6 8Q
Radeon R7 M270 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M270 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M270 here:
Main Specs
| GRID M6 8Q | Radeon R7 M270 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | Not Listed |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M6 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M270 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GRID M6 8Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M270 - in Laptops.
- GRID M6 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 M270 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M270 is 103 MHz higher, than GRID M6 8Q.
- GRID M6 8Q and Radeon R7 M270 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID M6 8Q and Radeon R7 M270 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 75−80 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 40−45 | − |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 525% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| GRID M6 8Q and Radeon R7 M270 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Dota 2 is 279% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Fortnite is 422% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 410% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Minecraft is 49% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 737% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in World of Tanks is 180% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M6 8Q | Radeon R7 M270 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN |
| Code name | GM204 | Opal XT / Mars |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 30 August 2015 | 7 January 2014 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 722 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 69.31 | 19.80 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,218 gflops | 633.6 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |