HD Graphics P630 vs Radeon R7 M270
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between HD Graphics P630 and Radeon R7 M270, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the HD Graphics P630 stacks up against Radeon R7 M270, check out specs charts below.
HD Graphics P630
Radeon R7 M270 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M270 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M270 here:
Main Specs
| HD Graphics P630 | Radeon R7 M270 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | Not Listed |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1740 MB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- HD Graphics P630 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon R7 M270 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- HD Graphics P630 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M270 - in Laptops.
- HD Graphics P630 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Radeon R7 M270 - with GCN.
- HD Graphics P630 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M270 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P630 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1400% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | − |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P630 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 203% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P630 in Dota 2 is 131% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P630 in Fortnite is 159% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P630 in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P630 in Minecraft is 45% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P630 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | − |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P630 in World of Tanks is 88% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
Full Specs
| HD Graphics P630 | Radeon R7 M270 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | GCN |
| Code name | Kaby-Lake-H-GT2 | Opal XT / Mars |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 5 August 2016 | 7 January 2014 |
| Pipelines | 24 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 26.40 | 19.80 |
| Floating-point performance | 633.6 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | - |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.1.103 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |