Quadro K2200M vs Radeon R7 M270
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro K2200M and Radeon R7 M270, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro K2200M stacks up against Radeon R7 M270, check out specs charts below.
Quadro K2200M
Radeon R7 M270 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M270 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M270 here:
Main Specs
Quadro K2200M | Radeon R7 M270 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | Not Listed |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro K2200M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R7 M270 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro K2200M is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M270 - in Laptops.
- Quadro K2200M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R7 M270 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M270 is 158 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
- Quadro K2200M and Radeon R7 M270 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro K2200M and Radeon R7 M270 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | − |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | − |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 542% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
Quadro K2200M and Radeon R7 M270 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 296% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 468% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 452% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 62% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 800% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
low / 768p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 180% more, than Radeon R7 M270. |
Full Specs
Quadro K2200M | Radeon R7 M270 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN |
Code name | GM107 | Opal XT / Mars |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 19 July 2014 | 7 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 667 MHz | 825 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 26.68 | 19.80 |
Floating-point performance | 853.8 gflops | 633.6 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | |
Shader Model | 5 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |