Radeon R5 430 OEM vs Radeon R7 M270
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Radeon R5 430 OEM and Radeon R7 M270. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Radeon R5 430 OEM and Radeon R7 M270. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R5 430 OEM
Radeon R7 M270 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M270 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M270 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R5 430 OEM | Radeon R7 M270 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | Not Listed |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon R5 430 OEM is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M270 - in Laptops.
- Radeon R5 430 OEM is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 M270 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M270 is 95 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- Radeon R5 430 OEM and Radeon R7 M270 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 160% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Dota 2 is 106% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Fortnite is 113% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | − |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Grand Theft Auto V is 121% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Minecraft is 54% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 9−10 | − |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in World of Tanks is 104% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R5 430 OEM | Radeon R7 M270 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN |
| Code name | Oland | Opal XT / Mars |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 30 June 2016 | 7 January 2014 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 780 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 18.72 | 19.80 |
| Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | 633.6 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 36.8 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |