Radeon R7 M270 vs Tesla C2050
When comparing Radeon R7 M270 and Tesla C2050, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon R7 M270 and Tesla C2050 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla C2050
Radeon R7 M270 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M270 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M270 here:
Main Specs
Radeon R7 M270 | Tesla C2050 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 238 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | Not Listed | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Radeon R7 M270 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R7 M270 is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- Radeon R7 M270 is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M270 is 251 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- Radeon R7 M270 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | − | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 514% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
Radeon R7 M270 and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 279% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 422% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 410% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 49% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 737% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | − | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than Radeon R7 M270. |
Full Specs
Radeon R7 M270 | Tesla C2050 | |
Architecture | GCN | Fermi |
Code name | Opal XT / Mars | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 7 January 2014 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 384 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 950 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 19.80 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 633.6 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |