Radeon R7 M270 vs Tesla T4
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Radeon R7 M270 and Tesla T4, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Radeon R7 M270 stacks up against Tesla T4, check out specs charts below.
Tesla T4
Radeon R7 M270 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M270 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M270 here:
Main Specs
Radeon R7 M270 | Tesla T4 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 70 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | Not Listed | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon R7 M270 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla T4 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R7 M270 is used in Laptops, and Tesla T4 - in Desktops.
- Radeon R7 M270 is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla T4 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M270 is 240 MHz higher, than Tesla T4.
- Radeon R7 M270 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla T4 - by 12 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6100% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Radeon R7 M270 and Tesla T4 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | − | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 685% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
Radeon R7 M270 and Tesla T4 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Dota 2 is 313% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Fortnite is 740% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Minecraft is 75% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1212% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in World of Tanks is 188% more, than Radeon R7 M270. |
Full Specs
Radeon R7 M270 | Tesla T4 | |
Architecture | GCN | Turing |
Code name | Opal XT / Mars | TU104 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 7 January 2014 | 13 September 2018 |
Pipelines | 384 | 2560 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 585 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1590 MHz | |
Transistor count | 950 million | 13,600 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 19.80 | 254.4 |
Floating-point performance | 633.6 gflops | |
Length | 168 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 320.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_1) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
CUDA | 7.5 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |