FireStream 9250 vs Radeon R7 M270DX
When choosing between FireStream 9250 and Radeon R7 M270DX, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9250 and Radeon R7 M270DX.
FireStream 9250
Radeon R7 M270DX
Main Specs
FireStream 9250 | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | IGP |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M270DX uses IGP interface.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Radeon R7 M270DX - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M270DX is 275 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M270DX - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Battlefield 5 is 25% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 11% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Dota 2 is 8% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Far Cry 5 is 25% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Fortnite is 5% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Forza Horizon 4 is 30% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Grand Theft Auto V is 23% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Minecraft is 6% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
FireStream 9250 and Radeon R7 M270DX have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 16% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 60% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in World of Tanks is 13% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9250 | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
Architecture | TeraScale | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | RV770 | Topaz |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 11 June 2014 |
Pipelines | 800 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 940 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | 1,550 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 22.56 |
Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |