GeForce GTX 1050 mobile vs Radeon R7 M270DX
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 1050 mobile and Radeon R7 M270DX you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 1050 mobile will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M270DX will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 M270DX
GeForce GTX 1050 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1050 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1050 mobile here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1050 mobile | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 1050 mobile is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M270DX uses IGP interface.
- GeForce GTX 1050 mobile is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M270DX - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1050 mobile is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon R7 M270DX - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1050 mobile is 454 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M270DX.
- GeForce GTX 1050 mobile is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M270DX - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 416% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 525% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 1050 mobile and Radeon R7 M270DX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 210−220 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 130−140 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 180−190 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 162% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 mobile in Dota 2 is 127% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 650% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 80−85 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 mobile in Fortnite is 261% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 428% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | − |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 275% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 mobile in Metro Exodus is 800% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 mobile in Minecraft is 33% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 600% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 9−10 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 660% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 mobile in World of Tanks is 65% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1050 mobile | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | GP107B | Topaz |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 3 January 2017 | 11 June 2014 |
Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1493 MHz | 940 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 1,550 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 59.72 | 22.56 |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
G-SYNC support | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 640 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDCP | 2.2 | |
Laptop size | large | |
GameStream | + | |
GPU Boost | 3.0 | |
Check Price |