GeForce GTX 680M vs Radeon R7 M270DX
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 680M and Radeon R7 M270DX you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 680M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M270DX will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 M270DX
GeForce GTX 680M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 680M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 680M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 680M | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | IGP |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 680M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R7 M270DX uses IGP interface.
- GeForce GTX 680M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M270DX - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 680M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 M270DX - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M270DX is 180 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 680M.
- GeForce GTX 680M and Radeon R7 M270DX are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 283% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Battlefield 5 is 350% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 108% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Dota 2 is 93% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Far Cry 5 is 425% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Fortnite is 177% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Forza Horizon 4 is 285% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | − |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Grand Theft Auto V is 187% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Metro Exodus is 533% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Minecraft is 22% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 433% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 9−10 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 460% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in World of Tanks is 71% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 680M | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | N13E-GTX | Topaz |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 4 June 2012 | 11 June 2014 |
Pipelines | 1344 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 720 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 758 MHz | 940 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,550 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 80.6 billion/sec | 22.56 |
Floating-point performance | 2,038 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 1344 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 100 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 680M vs Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire
- GeForce GTX 680M vs Quadro M1000M
- Radeon R7 M270DX vs Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire
- Radeon R7 M270DX vs Quadro M1000M
- GeForce GTX 680M vs Radeon E6760
- GeForce GTX 680M vs HD Graphics 515
- Radeon R7 M270DX vs Radeon E6760
- Radeon R7 M270DX vs HD Graphics 515