GeForce GTX 680MX vs Radeon R7 M270DX
When choosing between GeForce GTX 680MX and Radeon R7 M270DX, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 680MX and Radeon R7 M270DX.
Radeon R7 M270DX
GeForce GTX 680MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 680MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 680MX here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 680MX | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 122 Watt | |
| Interface | IGP | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 680MX is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M270DX - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 680MX is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 M270DX - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M270DX is 180 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 680MX.
- GeForce GTX 680MX and Radeon R7 M270DX are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 416% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Battlefield 5 is 500% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 680MX and Radeon R7 M270DX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 154% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Dota 2 is 122% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Far Cry 5 is 625% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 130−140 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Fortnite is 255% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Forza Horizon 4 is 414% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | − |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Grand Theft Auto V is 243% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Metro Exodus is 733% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Minecraft is 33% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 600% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 7−8 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 640% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in World of Tanks is 65% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 680MX | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | Topaz | |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 23 October 2012 | 11 June 2014 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 720 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 940 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3540 Million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 22.56 |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 1536 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| 3D Vision | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 57 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |