GeForce GTX 860M vs Radeon R7 M270DX
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 860M and Radeon R7 M270DX. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 860M and Radeon R7 M270DX. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R7 M270DX
GeForce GTX 860M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 860M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 860M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 860M | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 860M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R7 M270DX uses IGP interface.
- GeForce GTX 860M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M270DX - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 860M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R7 M270DX - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M270DX is 103 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 860M.
- GeForce GTX 860M and Radeon R7 M270DX are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Battlefield 5 is 362% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 118% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 100−105 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Dota 2 is 97% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Far Cry 5 is 450% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Fortnite is 177% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Forza Horizon 4 is 300% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | − |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Grand Theft Auto V is 187% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Metro Exodus is 533% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Minecraft is 22% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 433% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 460% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in World of Tanks is 71% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 860M | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | N15P-GX | Topaz |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 12 March 2014 | 11 June 2014 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 797 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 915 MHz | 940 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 43.40 | 22.56 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 1152 or 640 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |