GeForce GTX 960M vs Radeon R7 M270DX
When choosing between GeForce GTX 960M and Radeon R7 M270DX, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 960M and Radeon R7 M270DX.
Radeon R7 M270DX
GeForce GTX 960M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 960M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 960M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 960M | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | IGP |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 960M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R7 M270DX uses IGP interface.
- GeForce GTX 960M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M270DX - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 960M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R7 M270DX - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 960M is 196 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M270DX.
- GeForce GTX 960M and Radeon R7 M270DX are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 333% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Battlefield 5 is 400% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 122% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Dota 2 is 102% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Fortnite is 194% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Forza Horizon 4 is 325% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Grand Theft Auto V is 212% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Minecraft is 27% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 433% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 500% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 960M | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | N16P-GX | Topaz |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 12 March 2015 | 11 June 2014 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 1096 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1202 MHz | 940 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 47.04 | 22.56 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,505 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 640 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 175 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GameStream | + | |
| GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| BatteryBoost | + | |
| Check Price |