GRID K160Q vs Radeon R7 M270DX
When choosing between GRID K160Q and Radeon R7 M270DX, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K160Q and Radeon R7 M270DX.
GRID K160Q
Radeon R7 M270DX
Main Specs
| GRID K160Q | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
| Memory type | DDR3 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- GRID K160Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M270DX uses IGP interface.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 M270DX - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M270DX is 50 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
- GRID K160Q and Radeon R7 M270DX are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 20% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in Dota 2 is 20% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in Fortnite is 34% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in Forza Horizon 4 is 71% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in Grand Theft Auto V is 14% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in Minecraft is 24% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | − | 7−8 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 133% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in World of Tanks is 11% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K160Q | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | GK107 | Topaz |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 11 June 2014 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 940 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 22.56 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |