GRID K240Q vs Radeon R7 M270DX
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID K240Q and Radeon R7 M270DX. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID K240Q and Radeon R7 M270DX. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K240Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon R7 M270DX
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Main Specs
GRID K240Q | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- GRID K240Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M270DX uses IGP interface.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 M270DX - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M270DX is 155 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
- GRID K240Q and Radeon R7 M270DX are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 187% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 64% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
GRID K240Q and Radeon R7 M270DX have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 54% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 95% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 150% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 100−105 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 19% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 250% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
medium / 768p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 260% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 44% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. |
Full Specs
GRID K240Q | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | GK104 | Topaz |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 11 June 2014 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 940 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,550 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 22.56 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |