GRID M10 8Q vs Radeon R7 M270DX
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID M10 8Q and Radeon R7 M270DX. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID M10 8Q and Radeon R7 M270DX. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID M10 8Q
Radeon R7 M270DX
Main Specs
| GRID M10 8Q | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- GRID M10 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M270DX uses IGP interface.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID M10 8Q is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R7 M270DX - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 133 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M270DX.
- GRID M10 8Q and Radeon R7 M270DX are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 262% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 84% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Dota 2 is 72% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Fortnite is 138% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 212% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 137% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Minecraft is 25% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 316% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 30−33 | 7−8 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 340% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in World of Tanks is 57% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M10 8Q | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | GM107 | Topaz |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 18 May 2016 | 11 June 2014 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | 940 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 52.24 | 22.56 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |