Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Radeon R7 M270DX
When choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Radeon R7 M270DX, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Radeon R7 M270DX.
Radeon R7 M270DX
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 640 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 640 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | IGP |
Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon R7 M270DX uses IGP interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M270DX - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Radeon R7 M270DX - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M270DX is 600 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M270DX - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Radeon R7 M270DX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 23% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Far Cry 5 is 125% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Fortnite is 40% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Forza Horizon 4 is 62% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Grand Theft Auto V is 50% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Minecraft is 9% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 116% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 160% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in World of Tanks is 23% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | Topaz |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 3 January 2017 | 11 June 2014 |
Pipelines | 48 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | 940 MHz |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,550 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 | 22.56 |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | 1.2.131 |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs GeForce GTX 660M
- Radeon R7 M270DX vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- Radeon R7 M270DX vs GeForce GTX 660M
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Radeon E6760
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs HD Graphics 515
- Radeon R7 M270DX vs Radeon E6760
- Radeon R7 M270DX vs HD Graphics 515