Quadro 5010M vs Radeon R7 M270DX
In this comparison between Quadro 5010M and Radeon R7 M270DX you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 5010M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M270DX will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 M270DX
Quadro 5010M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 5010M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 5010M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro 5010M | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | IGP |
| Memory type | GDDR5 ECC | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 5010M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R7 M270DX uses IGP interface.
- Quadro 5010M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M270DX - in Desktops.
- Quadro 5010M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R7 M270DX - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M270DX is 450 MHz higher, than Quadro 5010M.
- Quadro 5010M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M270DX - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Battlefield 5 is 187% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 54% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| Quadro 5010M and Radeon R7 M270DX have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Dota 2 is 45% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Fortnite is 86% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Forza Horizon 4 is 137% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Grand Theft Auto V is 93% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Minecraft is 16% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 216% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 240% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in World of Tanks is 39% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro 5010M | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | N12E-Q5 | Topaz |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 22 February 2011 | 11 June 2014 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 940 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 22.56 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |