Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon R7 M270DX
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon R7 M270DX. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon R7 M270DX. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro FX 3800
Radeon R7 M270DX
Main Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
- Quadro FX 3800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M270DX uses IGP interface.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Quadro FX 3800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 M270DX - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M270DX is 300 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M270DX - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 20% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon R7 M270DX have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in Dota 2 is 17% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in Far Cry 5 is 66% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in Fortnite is 34% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in Forza Horizon 4 is 66% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in Grand Theft Auto V is 17% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in Minecraft is 24% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | − | 7−8 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 133% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in World of Tanks is 11% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | GT200B | Topaz |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 30 March 2009 | 11 June 2014 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 940 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.40 | 22.56 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |