Quadro K2000M vs Radeon R7 M270DX
When comparing Quadro K2000M and Radeon R7 M270DX, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro K2000M and Radeon R7 M270DX is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R7 M270DX
Quadro K2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K2000M | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | IGP |
| Memory type | DDR3 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R7 M270DX uses IGP interface.
- Quadro K2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M270DX - in Desktops.
- Quadro K2000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 M270DX - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M270DX is 155 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
- Quadro K2000M and Radeon R7 M270DX are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| Quadro K2000M and Radeon R7 M270DX have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Battlefield 5 is 12% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| Quadro K2000M and Radeon R7 M270DX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 3% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in Dota 2 is 2% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| Quadro K2000M and Radeon R7 M270DX have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in Fortnite is 5% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| Quadro K2000M and Radeon R7 M270DX have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 4% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| Quadro K2000M and Radeon R7 M270DX have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Minecraft is 3% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| Quadro K2000M and Radeon R7 M270DX have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| Quadro K2000M and Radeon R7 M270DX have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 16% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in World of Tanks is 7% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K2000M | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | N14P-Q3 | Topaz |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 June 2012 | 11 June 2014 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 940 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 23.84 | 22.56 |
| Floating-point performance | 572.2 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 18 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |