Quadro K4100M vs Radeon R7 M270DX
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro K4100M and Radeon R7 M270DX, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro K4100M stacks up against Radeon R7 M270DX, check out specs charts below.
Radeon R7 M270DX
Quadro K4100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K4100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4100M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K4100M | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | IGP |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K4100M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R7 M270DX uses IGP interface.
- Quadro K4100M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M270DX - in Desktops.
- Quadro K4100M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 M270DX - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M270DX is 194 MHz higher, than Quadro K4100M.
- Quadro K4100M and Radeon R7 M270DX are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Battlefield 5 is 237% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 76% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Dota 2 is 66% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Fortnite is 122% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Forza Horizon 4 is 187% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 118% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Metro Exodus is 333% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Minecraft is 21% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 266% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in World of Tanks is 52% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K4100M | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | N15E-Q3-A2 | Topaz |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 23 July 2013 | 11 June 2014 |
| Pipelines | 1152 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 706 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 940 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 67.78 | 22.56 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,627 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 102.4 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 51 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |