Quadro M1000M vs Radeon R7 M270DX
When comparing Quadro M1000M and Radeon R7 M270DX, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro M1000M and Radeon R7 M270DX is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R7 M270DX
Quadro M1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M1000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro M1000M | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB/4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro M1000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R7 M270DX uses IGP interface.
- Quadro M1000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M270DX - in Desktops.
- Quadro M1000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R7 M270DX - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M1000M is 93 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M270DX.
- Quadro M1000M and Radeon R7 M270DX are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Battlefield 5 is 325% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 105% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Dota 2 is 93% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Far Cry 5 is 425% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Fortnite is 166% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 262% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | − |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 175% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Minecraft is 28% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 366% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 420% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in World of Tanks is 68% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro M1000M | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | GM107 | Topaz |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 2 October 2015 | 11 June 2014 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 993 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1072 MHz | 940 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.78 | 22.56 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,017 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 0.22 kh/s | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 140 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |