Radeon Pro 460 vs Radeon R7 M270DX
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Radeon Pro 460 and Radeon R7 M270DX, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Radeon Pro 460 stacks up against Radeon R7 M270DX, check out specs charts below.
Radeon R7 M270DX
Radeon Pro 460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon Pro 460 | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon Pro 460 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon R7 M270DX uses IGP interface.
- Radeon Pro 460 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M270DX - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro 460 is build with Polaris architecture, and Radeon R7 M270DX - with GCN 3.0.
- Both graphics cards have the same core clock speed.
- Radeon Pro 460 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M270DX - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 316% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Battlefield 5 is 400% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 120% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Dota 2 is 102% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Far Cry 5 is 475% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 194% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Forza Horizon 4 is 325% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 212% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Minecraft is 27% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 433% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 480% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon Pro 460 | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
| Architecture | Polaris | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 11 / Baffin XT | Topaz |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 8 August 2016 | 11 June 2014 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 907 MHz | 940 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 58.05 | 22.56 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,858 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 227 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |