Radeon R7 M270DX vs Radeon R9 M295X
In this comparison between Radeon R7 M270DX and Radeon R9 M295X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon R7 M270DX will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M295X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 M270DX
Radeon R9 M295X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M295X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M295X here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R7 M270DX | Radeon R9 M295X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | |
| Interface | IGP | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | System Shared | Not Listed |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R7 M270DX is connected by IGP, and Radeon R9 M295X uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Radeon R7 M270DX is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M295X - in Laptops.
- Radeon R7 M270DX is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M295X - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M270DX is 177 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M295X.
- Radeon R7 M270DX and Radeon R9 M295X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Battlefield 5 is 787% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon R7 M270DX and Radeon R9 M295X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 200% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Dota 2 is 139% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Fortnite is 422% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Forza Horizon 4 is 728% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Minecraft is 44% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1016% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 7−8 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1140% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in World of Tanks is 76% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R7 M270DX | Radeon R9 M295X | |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 3 |
| Code name | Topaz | Tonga |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 11 June 2014 | 16 October 2014 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 723 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 940 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,550 million | 5,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 22.56 | 92.54 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | Not Listed |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 392 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |