Radeon R7 M270DX vs Radeon R9 M395X
When choosing between Radeon R7 M270DX and Radeon R9 M395X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Radeon R7 M270DX and Radeon R9 M395X.
Radeon R7 M270DX
Radeon R9 M395X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M395X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M395X here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R7 M270DX | Radeon R9 M395X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | |
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R7 M270DX is connected by IGP, and Radeon R9 M395X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R7 M270DX is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M395X - in Laptops.
- Radeon R7 M270DX is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M395X - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M270DX is 177 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395X.
- Radeon R7 M270DX and Radeon R9 M395X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 483% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Battlefield 5 is 550% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon R7 M270DX and Radeon R9 M395X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 240−250 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 210−220 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 130−140 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 180−190 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 166% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Dota 2 is 127% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Far Cry 5 is 725% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Fortnite is 294% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Forza Horizon 4 is 485% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | − | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Grand Theft Auto V is 293% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Metro Exodus is 866% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Minecraft is 33% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 111% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 683% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 7−8 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 740% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in World of Tanks is 71% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R7 M270DX | Radeon R9 M395X | |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 3 |
| Code name | Topaz | Amethyst XT |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 11 June 2014 | 16 October 2014 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 723 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 940 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,550 million | 5,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 22.56 | 92.54 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 413 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| TrueAudio | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |