Radeon R7 M270DX vs Tesla C2070
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Radeon R7 M270DX and Tesla C2070. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Radeon R7 M270DX and Tesla C2070. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R7 M270DX
Tesla C2070
Main Specs
Radeon R7 M270DX | Tesla C2070 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 238 Watt | |
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
- Radeon R7 M270DX is connected by IGP, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Radeon R7 M270DX is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M270DX is 326 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- Radeon R7 M270DX is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 362% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 111% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 102% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 450% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 177% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 300% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 187% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 533% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 27% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 77% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 433% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 460% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. |
Full Specs
Radeon R7 M270DX | Tesla C2070 | |
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Topaz | GF100 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Release date | 11 June 2014 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 384 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 940 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,550 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 22.56 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2988 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 143.4 GB/s | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |