GRID K160Q vs Radeon R7 M275DX
In this comparison between GRID K160Q and Radeon R7 M275DX you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K160Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M275DX will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K160Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon R7 M275DX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M275DX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M275DX here:
Main Specs
GRID K160Q | Radeon R7 M275DX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GRID K160Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M275DX - in Laptops.
- GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 M275DX - with GCN.
- GRID K160Q and Radeon R7 M275DX are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 220% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in Battlefield 5 is 400% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 M275DX. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 81% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
GRID K160Q and Radeon R7 M275DX have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in Dota 2 is 72% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in Far Cry 5 is 375% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in Fortnite is 126% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in Forza Horizon 4 is 257% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in Grand Theft Auto V is 67% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in Minecraft is 44% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 56% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1600% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | − | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 633% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in World of Tanks is 55% more, than GRID K160Q. |
Full Specs
GRID K160Q | Radeon R7 M275DX | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN |
Code name | GK107 | |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 4 June 2014 |
Pipelines | 192 | 896 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 13.60 | |
Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12, Shader 5.0 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Eyefinity | + | |
AppAcceleration | + | |
Check Price |