Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon R7 M275DX
In this comparison between Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon R7 M275DX you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro FX 3800 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M275DX will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro FX 3800
Radeon R7 M275DX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M275DX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M275DX here:
Main Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon R7 M275DX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M275DX - in Laptops.
- Quadro FX 3800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 M275DX - with GCN.
- Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M275DX - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in Battlefield 5 is 400% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 M275DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 81% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon R7 M275DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in Dota 2 is 68% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in Far Cry 5 is 433% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in Fortnite is 126% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in Forza Horizon 4 is 266% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in Grand Theft Auto V is 110% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in Metro Exodus is 1800% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in Minecraft is 44% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 750% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| medium / 768p | − | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 633% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in World of Tanks is 55% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon R7 M275DX | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN |
| Code name | GT200B | |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 30 March 2009 | 4 June 2014 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 896 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.40 | |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX 12, Shader 5.0 |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |