Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon R7 M275DX
When choosing between Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon R7 M275DX, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon R7 M275DX.
Quadro FX 4800
Radeon R7 M275DX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M275DX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M275DX here:
Main Specs
| Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon R7 M275DX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 4800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M275DX - in Laptops.
- Quadro FX 4800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 M275DX - with GCN.
- Quadro FX 4800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M275DX - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in Battlefield 5 is 150% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 M275DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 48% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon R7 M275DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in Dota 2 is 43% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in Fortnite is 78% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in Forza Horizon 4 is 125% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in Grand Theft Auto V is 66% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in Minecraft is 15% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 38% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 183% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 220% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in World of Tanks is 39% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon R7 M275DX | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN |
| Code name | GT200B | |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 11 November 2008 | 4 June 2014 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 896 |
| Core clock speed | 602 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.53 | |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX 12, Shader 5.0 |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |