FirePro V5800 vs Radeon R7 M340
In this comparison between FirePro V5800 and Radeon R7 M340 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V5800 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M340 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro V5800
Radeon R7 M340 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M340 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M340 here:
Main Specs
FirePro V5800 | Radeon R7 M340 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M340 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon R7 M340 has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M340 - in Laptops.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Radeon R7 M340 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M340 is 331 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M340 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 3000 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M340.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1600% more, than Radeon R7 M340. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M340 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 228% more, than Radeon R7 M340. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M340 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Dota 2 is 131% more, than Radeon R7 M340. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Fortnite is 159% more, than Radeon R7 M340. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Grand Theft Auto V is 173% more, than Radeon R7 M340. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Minecraft is 69% more, than Radeon R7 M340. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 300% more, than Radeon R7 M340. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
low / 768p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | − |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in World of Tanks is 120% more, than Radeon R7 M340. |
Full Specs
FirePro V5800 | Radeon R7 M340 | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN |
Code name | Juniper | Meso Pro DDR3 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 26 April 2010 | 16 June 2015 |
Pipelines | 800 | 320 |
Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 1021 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1021 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 17.16 |
Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 549.1 gflops |
Length | 229 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 16 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | N/A | + |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 74 Mh/s | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Check Price |